Ask HN: Is this the beginning of the end of open source?

If you're following the photopea incident, I'm sure you'd concur that the writing was on the wall. It's an inevitable outcome of the rise of AI in software dev. Any project that sees a semblance of success will be cloned overnight many times over and will find itself competing with its own copies.

We saw glimpses of a similar situation in the past when large cloud platforms cloned popular softwares in a not a very dissimilar manner. This led to the creation of "source available" as an alternative to open source that gained some traction of its own. But since this mostly affected a few large players, open source by and itself was large unaffected still supported by large volumes of individuals driven by passion, motivated towards their craft.

The concept of open source is itself something of an anomaly not seen in any other industry or at any other time in history. Partly fueled by an individual's desire to exhibit original work, and partly supported by the fact that code needs someone of an equal to work with, it still allowed authors to reap a net benefit while giving out their IP for free. LLMs have turned that picture over completely. It's not only trivial to derive, for all purposes, an exact copy of the IP while obscuring the source, it's also possible to maintain and operate the IP with a relatively low bar of expertise. But the other inconspicuous problem brought about by LLMs is that can you even claim original work any more? When no one believes that you wrote it yourself, what motivation remains to continue publishing as open source? With no net benefit to revealing your IP, will we see a revival to closed source distribution again?

2 points | by potamic 1 hour ago

3 comments

  • tagwall 21 minutes ago
    I publish and use more open source than I ever did in the past.
  • ticulatedspline 53 minutes ago
    > Any project that sees a semblance of success will be cloned overnight many times over and will find itself competing with its own copies.

    wasn't this always a risk with open source? also isn't that part of the point of open source? undoubtedly there are some forks out there that have become the new baseline. Besides, survival of the fittest. If some vibe-coded clone can compete, can manage updates, win market share, produce value superseding the original does that version not deserve it's share?

    Personally I don't think it's all that trivial to maintain a large FOSS project, that vibe coded clones will simply not keep up because they were low effort and when they realize even with all the AI tools in the world it's still work to maintain a product they'll die off.

    > what motivation remains to continue publishing as open source?

    What motivation was there ever? prestige? money? accolades? Is that motivation actually gone?

    Also closed source is not a protection anymore. look at Jev, they didn't even release the weights but everyone and their mother has a Jev-like model either out in the wild or in the works.

    • utsavmishra25 14 minutes ago
      I feel that open source already has a big ecosystem that has formed around a lot of older software. It does make managing what is good and what is bad more difficult considering outward flux of these programs is a lot higher and most of them are just straight up copy-paste of already existing software without any benefit over the already existing software. It very likely is gonna be a cycle where we will see a surge of these software and they will slowly die out with no support or updates provided as it happened before but at a faster rate now.
  • JessYouth 47 minutes ago
    [flagged]